Skip to the page
Radcliffe

Good answers have roots.

Radcliffe connects your company’s people, projects and documents. Ask a question. Follow the answer to its source1.

Request accessEarly-access requests are open. Onboarding opens later.

Choose a question to follow its sources.

A little context changes everything.

Files hold information.
Connections give it meaning.

A name in a brief. A number in a budget. A decision buried in a document. Radcliffe brings them into the same picture.

  1. Add your files

    Upload files, or keep a folder on a laptop in sync. Each new source starts visible to its owner only2.

  2. Connect the knowledge

    Radcliffe maps people, projects and facts into a knowledge graph. Every connection leads back to its source1.

  3. Check every fact

    The answer lists its sources first, and each footnote opens the passage it came from. If nothing answers, it says so3.

The answer. And everything behind it.

A useful answer should lead somewhere. Open a citation and go straight to the words that support it.

Product preview

Open a footnote to see the words it came from.

Northgate, in context

Reading asNorthgate team

What’s the Northgate budget, and who approves spending?

The approved budget is £2.4 million. Priya Shah leads the Northgate project.

Any single spend over £50,000 needs her sign-off before an order is placed.

3 sources
1
Northgate budget paper
Projects › Northgate › Finance · p. 2
The board agreed a total budget of £2.4 million on 14 March 2026. Any single spend over £50,000 needs sign-off from the project lead.
2
Northgate brief
Projects › Northgate · p. 2
Priya Shah is the project lead for Northgate and is responsible for delivery and approvals.
3
Spending approvals
Finance › Approvals · p. 3
Project leads approve single spends over £50,000 before an order is placed.

Three ways to work
with your knowledge.

Follow a connection. Get up to speed on a topic. Review documents side by side.

Knowledge graph

Follow a connection.
Find its source.

Move between people, projects and decisions. Open a relationship to see the passages that support it13.

Explore the knowledge graph
Explore a relationshipChoose a starting point
How does the work fit together?
Original source passagesProject relationships and their sources

Explore around a project

Start from a project and follow the people, organisations and facts connected to it. Open a link to see its evidence.

Selected: Projects
Topic pages

Get up to speed
on a whole topic.

Bring the summary, people, dated facts and open disagreements into one view. Follow any finding back to its sources13.

See what a topic brings together
A topic page

From the overview to the original passage.

SummaryThe subject at a glance
People and projectsWho and what is connected
Questions to askA useful next step

The context, together

Start with a summary, see who is involved and find the next question to ask.

Built from sources you can read.
Grid review

One set of questions.
Every document.

Choose your documents and questions. Each cell answers from its own document, with evidence to check before you edit or export14.

See how Grid review works
Your documents × your questionsChoose a cell to follow the review.
Grid review structure. Each document is a row and each question is a column. Select an intersection to see how its answer is checked.
DocumentsWhat is required?Who is responsible?When does it apply?
First document
Second document
Third document
Second documentWhat is required?

One cell. One document. Its evidence.

Read the answer beside its supporting passage. If this document does not say, the cell says “Not in this document”.

Choose documentsAsk questionsCheck, edit, export
Every view starts with what you can read.How access works

A shared memory. With personal boundaries.

Access is checked before search. Only evidence the reader may see can contribute to their answer1.

Reading asNorthgate team

What is the budget for the Northgate project?

Readable sourceNorthgate budget paper
Audience matchesOnly readable evidence
Answer for Northgate team

£2.4 million

Agreed by the board on 14 March 2026.

Change the reader. The question stays the same.

Hidden or missing evidence gets the same reply4.

Check the view before you share it.

Owners and admins can check a person or audience's view before sharing. Every preview is logged and stays within the admin's own access17.

What it reads

Radcliffe only reads. It never writes, moves or deletes anything where your files live5.

  • Files you upload

    Add files to your workspace from the browser. Limits are shown and checked before anything is sent.

  • A folder on a laptop

    A small sync app keeps one folder on a laptop up to date in your workspace.

  • More, once each is proven

    We add a source to this list only once it works with real files, not before.

Bring your sources.
Keep your tools.

Source connections bring information into Radcliffe. Assistant connections let you use that knowledge where you already work18.

Bring knowledge in

Choose a source to see how it enters.

Choose the material to read

Upload files or use the local sync agent for selected folders. Your admin sets up the source and its access.

File upload or local sync
RadcliffeConnected knowledge.
Original sources.Your access applies

Use knowledge here

Choose an assistant or coding tool below.

Assistant connection through MCP

Claude

Bring cited company knowledge into a Claude conversation.

The assistant retrieves sources your account can read. Setup and workspace permissions vary by client.

Assistants
Coding tools
Other clients

Setup guides describe what is available and what still needs validation. Connections open with product onboarding.

Explore sources and assistant setup

Replies a person approves.

Questions from your support form become tickets. Radcliffe drafts each reply from its sources, and a person reads it and sends it6.

Keep approved answers current.

An authorised reviewer can save an answer with an owner, audience and review date. Chat and ticket drafts can reuse it for a matching question. Source changes or overdue reviews stop reuse until it is checked again15.

Useful for recurring policy, onboarding and support questions.

Resolve conflicting information.

When extracted facts disagree, reviewers can compare the source passages, ask the owner or mark information out of date. People can also flag a passage that looks wrong16.

Give the team a place to investigate conflicting documents and record what they decide.

From the support formReading asPublic

“Can I bring my start date forward to 2 March?”

Draft reply

Yes. Your start date can move once your references are back. Reply to this email with the date you want.

1
Starters guide
People › Joining
A start date can move once references are back.
Waiting for a person to approve

Trust is in the details.

What keeps one company's files away from another, and one person's from the next.

  • Only people you admit

    Signing in proves who someone is; it does not let them in. Removing someone ends their access at once7.

  • Real files wait for a test

    Your real files go in only once a run with test data finds no leaks and your owners have checked it8.

  • Your own workspace

    Each company has its own private workspace. Nothing is pooled across companies or used to train models9.

  • Read-only, always

    Radcliffe never writes, moves or deletes anything in the places it reads5.

  • A record of every answer

    Each answer is kept with its sources, so you can see later what was said and where it came from10.

  • Planned EU hosting

    Company workspaces are planned for EU hosting when onboarding opens. Our privacy policy covers the access-request details collected now9.

How access works, in full

Different work. The same need to know.

Twelve industry packs provide the terminology, team structure and review rules for your work. Your organisation’s permissions and policies shape the setup. The same knowledge graph connects it all11.

  • LawConnect the matter, the client and the terms of the work.
    Documents you work with
    Engagement letters, agreements, attendance notes, client guidelines and the firm's precedents.
    A question you could ask
    “What scope and fee cap did we agree for this matter, and which client guidelines apply?”
    Access and human review
    Set up matter-team access and ethical walls, with separate audiences for conflict checks and internal risk notes. The pack marks legal enquiries and court deadlines for human handling.
  • Higher educationFind the right answer for a student's course and academic year.
    Documents you work with
    Course pages, module handbooks, assessment regulations, committee papers and student guidance.
    A question you could ask
    “Which resit rules apply to this cohort, and where is the current regulation?”
    Access and human review
    Set module memberships by academic year, with separate audiences for exam papers, wellbeing records and reserved committee items. Admissions and appeals are marked for human handling.
  • AccountingKeep each client's work tied to the right entity and reporting period.
    Documents you work with
    Engagement letters, audit working papers, tax computations, correspondence and versioned firm guidance.
    A question you could ask
    “What is included in this engagement, and which guidance applies to this reporting period?”
    Access and human review
    Define client and engagement boundaries, independence restrictions and staff-only audit passages. The pack excludes audit opinions, additional-service requests and third-party confirmations from automatic replies.
  • ConsultingFind useful experience without crossing a client's boundaries.
    Documents you work with
    Proposals, steering packs, workstream reports, interview notes and approved knowledge write-ups.
    A question you could ask
    “Who has relevant experience in this topic, and which approved write-ups can I use?”
    Access and human review
    Configure engagement teams, rival-client barriers and clean-team access. The pack distinguishes client material from approved firm knowledge; your firm's review and client-consent process determines what can be reused.
  • BankingConnect products, policies and customer work to the version in force.
    Documents you work with
    Product terms, rate sheets, policy editions, relationship files, committee papers and complaint records.
    A question you could ask
    “Which terms and rate sheet applied to this product on the customer's start date?”
    Access and human review
    Configure deal-team membership and information barriers, with narrower audiences for credit views and financial-crime notes. Lending, advice and account-specific enquiries are excluded from automatic replies.
  • Insurance and financial servicesFollow a policy or claim back to its wording and authority.
    Documents you work with
    Policy schedules, wording editions, endorsements, claims correspondence and settlement authority guides.
    A question you could ask
    “Which wording edition applies to this policy, and who has authority to review the claim?”
    Access and human review
    Define broker access by client, with separate audiences for reserve and counter-fraud notes. The pack marks claim decisions and personal financial recommendations for human review.
  • GovernmentConnect public guidance with the decisions and records behind it.
    Documents you work with
    Service guidance, committee reports, published decisions, resident correspondence and disclosure logs.
    A question you could ask
    “What did the committee decide about this scheme, and which guidance is now in force?”
    Access and human review
    Set separate audiences for public reports, exempt material, resident cases and safeguarding notes. The pack marks information-release requests and eligibility enquiries for officer review.
  • HealthcareMake organisational knowledge easier to find across services and sites.
    Documents you work with
    Local guidelines, referral pathways, standard procedures, on-call rotas and board papers, with their versions and review dates.
    A question you could ask
    “Where is the current referral pathway, and when is it due for review?”
    Access and human review
    This pack is for organisational guidance. It includes checks that quarantine documents containing recognised patient identifiers, restricted audiences for investigation details, and clinical enquiry categories for human review.
  • TechnologyJoin up customer context, product changes and operational knowledge.
    Documents you work with
    API documentation, release notes, design decisions, runbooks, incident reviews and account plans.
    A question you could ask
    “Which release changed this API, and what does the migration guidance say?”
    Access and human review
    Define customer-plan and account-role access, with separate audiences for security details and embargoed vulnerabilities. The pack excludes pricing and roadmap enquiries from automatic replies.
  • Property and housingBring the history of a place together without mixing up its residents.
    Documents you work with
    Tenancy and lease records, repair histories, safety certificates, block notices and service-charge papers.
    A question you could ask
    “Which repairs and safety certificates relate to this home, and what is due next?”
    Access and human review
    Define separate access for property records, resident correspondence and contractor work, with dated memberships where needed. Hazard and safeguarding enquiries are marked for human handling.
  • Pharma and life sciencesTrace studies, procedures and quality records through their changes.
    Documents you work with
    Trial protocols, effective standard procedures, approved product information, deviations and corrective-action records.
    A question you could ask
    “Which effective procedure applies here, and which corrective actions relate to this deviation?”
    Access and human review
    Configure separate study-team and trial-site audiences, including blinded and unblinded groups. The pack marks adverse-event reports, unblinding requests and medical enquiries for specialist handling.
  • EngineeringFind the released information for the project, asset or part in hand.
    Documents you work with
    Drawing registers, published revisions, work orders, method statements, change requests and handover records.
    A question you could ask
    “Which drawing revision is published for this asset, and where is the related work order?”
    Access and human review
    Set project and partner audiences alongside export-related access conditions. The pack distinguishes draft and released revisions, and marks design changes and safety enquiries for human handling.

Work in another field? The same foundation connects your documents, people and projects, with access set around your organisation.

Make the connections that matter.

Tell us what your team needs. We are collecting requests before onboarding opens12.

We save your request for review. We may contact you about onboarding. No account is created and no payment is taken.

Product notes & sources

Product previews use illustrative company data.

Notes

  1. 1Radcliffe extracts people, projects and facts from documents, with relationships linked to source passages. Search combines those connections with text and vector search. Every passage carries one access label. Each search checks it against the reader's access inside the database, before anything is ranked. How access works. Back
  2. 2File upload and laptop-folder sync are implemented. Other source connectors have separate setup and availability states in the platform. A source name or setup guide does not confirm live-service validation; credentials, permissions and real-data approval still apply. Back
  3. 3Each answer lists its sources first. A footnote opens the passage, checked again when you open it. When no source you can see answers a question, it says so. Back
  4. 4The reply is the same whether a file is hidden or does not exist, so a reply never hints at what someone may not see. Who sees what. Back
  5. 5Radcliffe's connector code cannot write: it refuses any request that would change, move or delete. Back
  6. 6A reply to a ticket is drafted only from sources the asker may see, with footnotes, and waits for a person to approve it. Sending without a person is off by default, and an owner can allow it only for topics they choose. Back
  7. 7A person gets in only once admitted to their company's workspace. Signing in with a work email or single sign-on proves who they are; it does not let them in. Removing someone ends their sessions and tokens at the same moment. Back
  8. 8Real files go in only after a full test run on test data finds no leaks for the release that is running, the company's own checks pass, and each planned source has a reviewed scan. A second owner then signs off. Real files wait for a test. Back
  9. 9This launch collects access requests only. Company workspaces and connected tools are not open yet. The product is designed to keep each company's information separate. Where data is kept. Back
  10. 10Each workspace keeps a record of each answer with its sources. The company decides how long chats and records are kept. Back
  11. 11The twelve industry packs define terminology, document patterns and review categories. The organisation still configures its permissions, memberships and policies; selecting a pack does not create information barriers by itself. The underlying product is shared. Back
  12. 12Sending the form records your interest for review. It does not create an account, take a payment or promise an onboarding date. Request access. Back
  13. 13The graph explorer supports search, relationships, paths and source passages. Dated facts can be viewed for a chosen date, with access checked at the time of reading. Generated topic pages combine summaries, members, facts and sources; a topic report is visible only when its underlying inputs are readable. Back
  14. 14Grid review compares documents against a set of questions. Each generated cell uses that row's document and checks its supporting quote. Cells can be reviewed and edited, and the comparison exported as CSV. Shared grids require the recipient to have access to every document. Grid review uses the connected workspace API and is unavailable during an audience preview. Back
  15. 15Verified answers require an authorised reviewer, an audience, an owner and a review date. Reuse depends on a sufficiently close question match, current sources and the reader's access. Source changes or an overdue review prevent reuse; owners can review, re-verify or retire the answer. Back
  16. 16The review queue surfaces disagreements between comparable extracted facts and passages people flag. Reviewers can inspect evidence they may read, ask the owner, keep both accounts or mark information out of date. Detection does not guarantee that every inconsistency will be found; actions depend on ownership and access. Back
  17. 17Owners and admins can preview an audience or named person's view, subject to their own access. Each preview records who ran it and the reason. A preview does not grant wider access. Back
  18. 18Radcliffe exposes MCP tools for search, source retrieval, answers and context, using individual OAuth sign-in and the reader's access. Client setup guides are separate from connected accounts and live-service verification. Hosting, client support and company settings apply. Marketplace listings, native plugins, local graph installers and CI impact analysis are not included. Request early access. Back